Cell Membrane Stability and Relative Water Content of Cymbopogon citratus (Lemon Grass)

Main Article Content

H. M. Maishanu
A. M. Rabe

Abstract

In this research the cell membrane stability (CMS), relative water content (RWC) and effect of different water interval on Cymbopogon citratus (lemon grass) was assessed. The cell membrane stability and relative water content of the plant shows the physiological activity of the plant. The plant sample was subjected to three different watering regimes viz: one, two- and three-days intervals with a control sample irrigated daily for a period of twelve months. Uniform stalk of lemon grass plants were planted into a depth of 7.5 cm composted soil, each treatment was made in triplicate. The evaluated growth parameters where height of the plant, number of leaves and tillers, which were taken weekly for period of twelve months (year). The height shows a significant difference from first to twelfth month after planting. The height of the plant increases simultaneous with the age of the plant. First month after planting show significant difference in height of sample watered daily and treated samples.  The results shows that the RWC (07.14%) and CMS (52.58%) was low in samples under water stress respectively when compared to well-watered samples (55.41%). No significant difference was observed between samples under one, two and three days interval. The number of leaves differs significantly in the first MAP except in the samples watered daily and three days interval. Maximum number of leaves was achieved at twelfth MAP under one day interval (137.33) followed by samples watered daily (126) and two days interval, while three days interval has the least number of leaves (leaf number). The number of tillers shows significant differences between the means at fifth and sixth MAP, (fifth MAP = 73.33 and sixth MAP = 126) and the treatments under one day intervals (fifth MAP = 18.33 and sixth MAP = 35.67). In the research, samples watered daily and under one day intervals shows high productivity when compared to the remaining treatment.

Keywords:
Cymbopogon citrates, Month after Planting (MAP), Cell Membrane Stability (CMS), Relative Water Content (RWC), irrigation frequency.

Article Details

How to Cite
Maishanu, H. M., & Rabe, A. M. (2019). Cell Membrane Stability and Relative Water Content of Cymbopogon citratus (Lemon Grass). Annual Research & Review in Biology, 33(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2019/v33i230114
Section
Method Article

References

Ogundele SO. Indigenous knowledge systems in Central Nigeria. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge; 2006.

Obi NI. Desertification and drought risk vulnerability: Potentials of desertification and drought risk management in Northern Nigeria (A case of Sokoto, Kano and Kaduna). Journal of Environmental Management and Safety. 2012;3:42-55.

Amina RM, Aliero BL, Gumi AM. Phytochemical screening and oil yield of a potential herb, camel grass (Cymbopogon schoenanthus Spreng.) Central European Journal of Experimental Science. 2013;2 (3):15-19. Available:http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html

Ranitha M, Abdurahman H, NourZiad A. Suleiman, Azhair H. Nour, Raj S. A comparative study of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil extracted by microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (HD) method. International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications. 2014;5(2):104.

Anonymous. Cymbopogon citratus.
Available:http://en.wikipedia.Org/wiki/Cymbopogon citratus
(Retrived on: 3/23/2010)

SERC. Sokoto Energy Research Center: Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Sokoto State; 2016.

Liu SC, Jin JQ, Ma JQ, Yao MZ, Ma CL, Li CF, Zhao-Tang Ding, Liang Chen, MaC. Transcriptomic analysis of tea plant responding to drought stress and recovery. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0147306.
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0147306)

Zhou P, An Y, Wang Z, Du H, Huang B. Characterization of gene expression Associated with drought Avoidance and tolerance trait in a perennial grass species. PLoSONE. 2014;9(8):e103611.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103611

Osakabe Y, Keishi O, Kazou S, Lam-so T. Response of plants to Water stress; 2014.
Available:http//www.responseofplanttowaterstress.com

Nishiyama R, Watanaba Y, Leyva-Gonzales MA, Vanha C, Fujita Y, Tanaka V. Arabidopsis AHP2, AHP3, AHP5 HistidinePhototransfer proteins function as reductant negative regulators of drought stress response. Proc. National Academic of Sciences U.S.A. 2013;110:4840-4845.

Ha CV, Leyva-Gonzaleez MA, Osakabe Y, Tran UT, Nishiyama R, Watanabe Y. Positive regulatory role of strigolactone in plant responses to drought and salt stress. Proc. National Academic of Sciences U.S.A. 2014;111:581-856.

Mahmoodian L, Naseri R, Mirzae A. Variability of grain yield and some important agronomic traits in Mungbean ((Vigina radiate L.) Cultivars as affected by drought stress. International Research Journal of Applied Basic Sciences. 2012;3 (3):486-492.

Allahmourdi P, Ghobadi M, Taherabadi S. Physiological aspects of mungbean in response to drought stress. Singapore International Conference of Food Engineering and Biotechnology. 2011;9.

Jogalah S, Govind SR, Tran LS. System biology based approaches toward understanding drought tolerance in food crops. Critical review biotechnology. 2012; 33:33-39.

Chaves MM, Percira JS, Maroco J, Rodriguues ML, Pinheiro CP, Osorio ML, Carvalho I, Faria T. How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and Growth. Annals of Botany. 2002;89: 907-916

Singh A, Kumar J, Kumar P. Effects of plant growth regulators and sucrose on post harvest physiology, membrane stability and vase life of cut spikes of gladiolus. Plant Growth Regul. 2008;55: 221-229.

Rabe AM, Aleiro BL, Maishanu HM, Maikudi HM. Influence of different water frequency on the growth and yield of Cymbopogon schoenanthus (camel grass). Asian Journal of Research in Agricultural and Forestry. 2018;1-15.

Naresh RK, Purushotam SP, Sigh Divivedi A, Vineetkumar. Effects of water stress on psychological process and yield attribute of different Mung bean (L) variated. African Journal of Biochemistry Research Academic Journals. 2013;7(5): 55-62.
Available:http://www.academicjournal.org/AJBR.

Li Z, Waker S, Fischer BB, Nyogi KK. Sensing and responding to excess light. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2009;60: 239-290.

Farooq M, Hussain M, Abdul Wahid, Siddique KHM. Plant response to drought stress. An overview, Morphological to molecular texture, Aroca (ed); 2012.
Available:http://www.springer.com/998-364232652-3.