Models of Inter-Moult Period for Antarctic Krill - Lack of Progress and Promulgation of Unreliable Models Calibrated Using Indirect Observations

Steven G. Candy *

SCandy Statistical Modelling Pty Ltd, 70 Burwood Drive, Blackmans Bay, Tasmania, Australia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aims: Two methods of calibrating regression models of inter-moult period (IMP) as a function of temperature exposure (T) for crustaceans, in particular, Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) are reviewed in terms of both theoretical and empirical properties in order to make recommendations on the application of the methods and/or the use of the resultant fitted models.

Methodology: The method and fitted model that used a meta-analysis of published results from laboratory-reared krill using means of directly observed IMP for a range of controlled, constant temperature regimes has valid theoretical and empirical support. The alternative used moult frequencies obtained as a “byproduct” of 5-d Instantaneous Growth Rate (IGR) experiments carried out at sea for which individual IMPs were not directly observed. Instead mean IMP given T and animal total length (L) was predicted using the moult frequencies disaggregated to binary data of moulted versus not-moulted as dependent variable in the calibration of a logistic regression on T and L. The shape of the daily development rate, R, the inverse of IMP, versus T response curve fitted using direct observations is a classical monotonically increasing curve whereas for combinations of sex/maturity classes the curves fitted using indirect observations are parabola-like with sexually dimorphic concavities of either up or down. Four sources of bias in predictions of mean IMP using the indirect observations and estimation method are described. One source due to an unrepresentative sampling frame can lead to large positive bias in estimated mean IMP based on theory which has been absent until now and that applies a discrete uniform distribution for next moult date corresponding to ideal asynchrony. This bias and that due to IGR experimental measurement error in T cannot be remedied.

Conclusion: The indirect method and the corresponding fitted models are unreliable and should not be used.

Keywords: Inter-moult period, laboratory experiments, at-sea IGR experiments, models, sampling methods


How to Cite

Candy, Steven G. 2024. “Models of Inter-Moult Period for Antarctic Krill - Lack of Progress and Promulgation of Unreliable Models Calibrated Using Indirect Observations”. Annual Research & Review in Biology 39 (6):1-15. https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2024/v39i62084.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kawaguchi S, Candy S, King R, Naganobu M, Nicol S. Modelling growth of Antarctic krill. I. Growth trends with sex, length, season, and region. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2006;306:1–15. Available:https://doi.org/10.3354/meps306001

Buchholz F. Moult cycle and growth of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba in the laboratory. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1991;69:217–229.

Brown M, Kawaguchi S, Candy S, Virtue P. Temperature effects on the growth and maturation of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2010 57:672–682. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.10.016

Tarling GA, Shreeve RS, Hirst AG, Atkinson A, Pond DW, Murphy EJ, et al. Natural growth rates in Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba): I. Improving methodology and predicting intermolt period. Limnology and Oceanography. 2006;51:959–972. Available:https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.2.0959

Candy S, Kawaguchi S. Modelling growth of Antarctic krill. II. Novel approach to describing the growth trajectory. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2006;306:17–30. Available:https://doi.org/10.3354/meps306017

Wiedenmann J, Cresswell K, Mangel M. Temperature-dependent growth of Antarctic krill: predictions for a changing climate from a cohort model. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2008;358:191–202. Available:https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07350

Atkinson A, Shreeve RS, Hirst AG, Rothery P, Tarling GA, Pond DW, et al. Natural growth rates in Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba): II. Predictive models based on food, temperature, body length, sex, and maturity stage. Limnology and Oceanography. 2006;51:973–987. Available:https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.2.0973

Bahlburg D, Thorpe SE, Meyer B, Berger U, Murphy EJ. An intercomparison of models predicting growth of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba): The importance of recognizing model specificity. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(7):e0286036. Available:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0286036

Stinner RE, Gutierrez AP, Butler Jr GD. An algorithm for temperature-dependent growth rate simulation. Canadian Entomologist. 1974; 106:519–524

Régnière J, Powell J, Bentz B, Nealis V. Effects of temperature on development, survival and reproduction of insects: experimental design, data analysis and modeling. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2012; 58: 634-647. DOI:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.01.010

Poleck TP, Denys CJ. Effect of temperature on the moulting, growth and maturation of the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba (Crustacea: Euphausiacea) under laboratory conditions. Marine Biology. 1982;70:255–265.

Rebaudo F, Rabhi VB. Modeling temperature‐dependent development rate and phenology in insects: Review of major developments, challenges, and future directions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2018;166:607-617. DOI: 10.1111/eea.12693

Carroll RJ, Wand MP. Semiparametric Estimation in Logistic Measurement Error Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). 1991;53:573-585.

Candy SG. Empirical Binomial Sampling Plans: model calibration and testing using William’s method III for generalised linear models with overdispersion. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics. 2002;7:373-388.

Candy SG. Predictive models for integrated pest management of the leaf beetle Chrysophtharta bimaculata in Eucalyptus nitens plantations in Tasmania. 2000; University of Tasmania. Thesis. https://doi.org/10.25959/23214194.v1

Kawaguchi S, King R, Meijers R, Osborn JE, Swadling KM, Ritz DA, Nicol S. An experimental aquarium for observing the schooling behaviour of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2010;57:683-692. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.10.017

Candy SG. Long-term trend in mean density of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) uncertain. Annual Research & Review in Biology. 2021;36:27-43.