• Submission

Annual Research & Review in Biology

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions & Author Guideline
    • Articles in Press
    • Editorial Policy
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewers
    • Propose a Special Issue
    • Reprints
    • Subscription
    • Membership
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Digital Archiving Policy
    • Contact
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Publication Charge
  • Books
  • Testimonials
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2021 - Volume 36 [Issue 3]
  4. Original Research Article

Submit Manuscript


Subscription



  • Home Page
  • Author Guidelines
  • Editorial Board Member
  • Editorial Policy
  • Propose a Special Issue
  • Membership

Evaluation of the response of Turkey strains to Salmonella and Newcastle vaccines

  • Ekei Victor Ikpeme

Annual Research & Review in Biology, Page 1-9
DOI: 10.9734/arrb/2021/v36i330348
Published: 30 March 2021

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract


This research work was carried out to evaluate the immune response of 3 turkey strains to salmonella and Newcastle vaccines measured via antibody titre. The study deployed a total of 120 poults (40 black, 40 white and 40 lavender) strains. To ascertain the initial antibody titre of all the birds, blood samples were obtained from their wing veins immediately after acclimatization for salmonella and Newcastle antibody titre.  The test for salmonella and Newcastle antibody titre responses of the birds were performed using widal and haemagglutination inhibition (HI), respectively. The birds were divided into two broad groups tagged as A and B, which represented Salmonella and Newcastle vaccines, respectively. Each group had 3 sub-groups denoting the 3 strains of turkey used for the study. After vaccination, blood samples were collected from all the birds at 3 and 5 days for laboratory assessment of antibody titre response. The results showed that there was significant increase (p<0.05) in the antibody titre response of all the turkey strains after vaccination. Results obtained on the time of exposure of the birds to vaccine revealed that higher antibody titre values were obtained from the black and white turkey strains at 3 days than at 5 days after administration of Newcastle vaccine, except in the lavender strain, which had higher titre value at 5 days after Newcastle vaccination. Following administration of salmonella vaccine, black and lavender strains had statistically higher antibody titre response (2.03 and 2.10 mean loge widal, respectively) than white strain (1.86 mean loge widal). Similarly, the black strain also had higher antibody titre value when Newcastle vaccine was administered (2.35 mean loge HI) followed by lavender (1.99 mean loge HI) and white strain (1.71 mean loge HI). Black strains showed more antibody titre response and by implication, stronger immunity to Salmonella and Newcastle vaccines. More importantly, the differential response of the 3 turkey strains to vaccine could give turkey breeders the choice of selection of turkey breeds for disease resistance breeding.


Keywords:
  • Turkey
  • widal
  • haemoglobin inhibition
  • vaccine
  • titre and antibody
  • Full Article – PDF
  • Review History

How to Cite

Ikpeme, E. V. (2021). Evaluation of the response of Turkey strains to Salmonella and Newcastle vaccines. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 36(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2021/v36i330348
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

References

World Health Organization. Children: Improving survival and well-being. 2020; 7:50.
Accessed: 26th February, 2021.
Available:https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/children-reducing-mortality.

Ahmed T, Saeed SAM, Hussien, HA. Evaluation of poultry meat safety based on ISO 22000 as food safety management system. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2013;12:121-129.

Aslam ML. Genetic control and variation in Turkey: Molecular insights in selection. PhD. Dissertation. Wageningen University: Netherlands; 2012.

TNAU Agritech Portal. Animal husbandry. In. Coimbatore: Tamil Nadu Agriculture University; 2011.

Kumarbek A, Aidyn I, Almagul N, Eleonora O, Samat K, Nazerke M, Zhanibek Y. Comparative analysis of red and white turkey meat quality. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2017;16:412-416.

Biesalski HK. Meat as a component of a healthy diet- are there any risks or benefit if meat is avoided in the diet? Meat Science. 2005;70:509-524.

Jukna V, Klementaviciute J, Meskinyte-Kausiliene E, Peciulaitiene N, Samborskyte M, Ambrasunas L. Comparative evaluation of quality and composition of ostrich, turkey and broiler meat. Biotechnol. Anim. Husband. 2012; 28:385-392.

Baggio SR, Vicente E, Bragagnolo N. Cholesterol oxides, cholesterol, total lipid and fatty acid composition in turkey meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002;50:5981-5986.

Ryan J. Global turkey meat market: key findings and insights. 2018;7:30.
Accessed: 26th February, 2021.
Available:https://www.thepoultrysite.com/news/2018/05/global-turkey-meat-market-key-findings-and-insights.

United Nations world population prospects- United Nations population estimates and projections. 2019;11:42.
Accessed: 10th September, 2020.
Available:https://population.un.org/wpp/.

World Population Review. 2020;11:39.
Accessed: 10th September, 2020.
Available:https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/nigeria-population.

Annemarie P, Angelina K, Ellen DA, Wilfrid VP, Lucas W. Phenotypic behavior of 35 Salmonella enterica serovars compared to epidemiological and genomic data. Procedia Food Science. 2016;7:53–58.

Rovelledo LT. Avian Salmonellosis, vaccines and immune mechanisms of protection. Bahia, Brazil: Salvador. 2012;4-7.

Nagaraja KV, Pomeroy BS. Coronaviral enteritis of turkeys (bluecomb disease). In: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, McDougald LR, Saif YM. Diseases of poultry. 10th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1997.

Brujeni GN, Hassanzadeh M, Al-Karagoly H, Tolouei T, Esmailnejad A. Evaluation of humoral immune responses to enterotropic lentogenic VG/GA vaccine of Newcastle disease in commercial turkey poults (Meleagris gallopavo). Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2019;61(41):16.

Alexander DJ. Newcastle disease and other avian paramyxoviruses. Rev Sci Technol Oie. 2000;9:443–55.

Kaleta EF, Baldauf C. Newcastle disease in free-living and pet birds. In: Newcastle disease. Springer. 1988;197–246.

Alexander DJ, Aldous EW, Fuller CM. The long view: A selective review of 40 years of Newcastle disease research. Avian Pathology. 2012;41:329–335.

Ikpeme EV, Ekerette EE, Efienokwu JN, Ozoje MO. Immune response of Nigerian chicken genotypes to salmonella and newcastle vaccines. Trends Applied Sci. Res. 2019;14:296-302.

Kaboudi K. Virus-induced immunosuppression in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo): A review. Open Veterinary Journal. 2019;9(4):349–360.

Hoerr FJ. Clinical aspects of immunosuppression in poultry. Avian Dis. 2010;54(1):2–15.

Cazaban C. Immunosuppression in chickens - what is it?. Int. Poult. Prod. 2015;13:13–14.

World Organization of Animal Health (OIE). Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals (mammals, birds and bees). 7th edn. World Organization of Animal Health (OIE): France. 2012;2

Jahan N, Khatoon R, Mehrotra AS, Kumar S. Comparative evaluation of slide agglutination and widal tube agglutination test in detecting enteric fever among patients attending a tertiary care hospital in north India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016; 4(10):4290-4296.

Stear M. OIE manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals (Mammals, Birds and Bees), 5th edn. World Organization for Animal Health 2004: Cambridge Univ Press. 2005;1,2.

Maraqa AD. Studies on the immune response to Newcastle disease virus in poultry. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Paper. 1996;3:54.
Accessed 3rd May, 2017.
Available:http://lib.dr.iastate. edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12164&co ntext=rtd.

Reynolds D, Maraqa A. Protective immunity against Newcastle disease: The role of cell-mediated immunity. Avian Diseases. 2000;145–154.

Hesse M, Stamm A, Weber R, Glünder G, Berndt A. Immune response of turkey poults exposed at 1 day of age to either attenuated or wild Salmonella strains. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2016;74:1–10.

Munir IW, Bryden LW, Husband JA. Evaluation of the efficacy of intrapertoneal immunization in reducing salmonella typhimurium infection in chicken. Poult. Sci. 1988;77:1874-1883.

Loa CC, Lin TL, Wu CC, Bryan T, Thacker HL, Hooper T, Schrader D. Humoral and cellular Immune responses in turkey poults infected with turkey corona virus. Poultry Science. 2001;80:1416-1424.

Kremer CJ, O’Meara KM, Layton SL, Hargis BM, Coke K. Evaluation of recombinant salmonella expressing the flagella protein flic for persistence and enhanced antibody response in commercial turkeys. Poult. Sci. 2011; 90:752-758.

Rahman MM, Sarker RD, Nooruzzaman M. Evaluation of serum antibody titer level against Newcastle disease virus in vaccinated broiler chickens. Ann Vet Anim Sci. 2017;4:94–8.

Van BM, Bouma A, Fabri TH, Katsma E, Hartog L, Koch G. Herd immunity to Newcastle disease virus in poultry by vaccination. Avian Pathol. 2008;37:1–5.

Khalifeh M, Amawi M, Abu-Basha E, Yonis IB. Assessment of humoral and cellular-mediated immune response in chickens treated with tilmicosin, florfenicol, or enrofloxacin at the time of Newcastle disease vaccination. Poult Sci. 2009;88: 2118–24.

Horton R, Wilming L, Rand V, Lovering RC, Bruford EA, Khodiyar VK, et al. Gene map of the extended human MHC. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2004;5:889-899.

Kennedy RB, Ovsyannikova IG, Haralambieva IH, O’Byrne MM, Jacobson RM, Pankratz VS, et al. Multigenic control of measles vaccine immunity mediated by polymorphisms in measles receptor, innate pathway, and cytokine genes. Vaccine. 2012;30:2159–2167.

Dortmans JCFM, Koch G, Rottier PJM, Peeters BPH. Virulence of newcastle disease virus: what is known so far? Vet. Res. 2011;42:122.

Rowland K, Wolc A, Gallardo RA, Kelly T, Zhou H, Dekkers JCM, et al. Genetic analysis of a commercial egg laying line challenged with Newcastle disease virus. Front Genet. 2018;9:326.

Tykałowski B, Śmiałek M, Koncicki A, Ognik K, Zduńczyk Z, Jankowski J. The immune response of young turkeys to haemorrhagic enteritis virus infection at different levels and sources of methionine in the diet. BMC Veterinary Research. 2019;15(387):2-11.

Suresh M, Sharma J. M. Pathogenesis of type II avian adenovirus infection in turkeys: In vivo immune cell tropism and tissue distribution of the virus. J Virol. 1996;70:30–6.

Koncicki A, Tykałowski B, Stenzel T, Śmiałek M, Pestka D. Effect of infection of turkeys with haemorrhagic enteritis adenovirus isolate on the selected parameters of cellular immunity and the course of colibacillosis. Pol J Vet Sci. 2012;5:215–20.

Barrow PA. The paratyphoid salmonellae. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2000;19:351-357.
  • Abstract View: 79 times
    PDF Download: 41 times

Download Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Telegram
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Make a Submission / Login
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo


© Copyright 2010-Till Date, Annual Research & Review in Biology. All rights reserved.