Farmers’ Preference of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Varieties Introduced to Improve Plant Productivity in North Sumatra Province, Indonesia
Annual Research & Review in Biology,
A varietal testing had been undertaken in Pematangsiantar regency, North Sumatra province, Indonesia in 2015-2016. The objective of the study was to determine the preference of cassava growers to the introduced varieties compared to the existing cassava varieties. Twelve cassava varities (UB1/2, UB1472, Adira1, Malang4, Cecekijo, Farsem, Gajah, Ketan Jabung, Caspro, Malaysia, Adira4, and Cikaret) were tested using a Randomized Block Design with four replications. The data were taken on aboveground characters and underground characters such as root number, root diameter, root length, root weight, and starch content based on factory criteria (A = 22%, B = 18%, C = 14% and D = 10% starch content). Results of the study indicated that Malang-4 had the highest root yield (49,830 kg ha-1) followed by Farsem variety (41,690 kg ha-1), and Malaysia Local variety (41,030 kg ha-1). The bitter taste of Malang 4 was an appropriate character to be developed as starch processing of cassava. Starch content is very important indigenous criteria for farmers and traders to know fairly about pricing in relation with starch content. The higher starch content coincided with higher root yield of Malang-4 is very interesting and will benefit the factory. There was no difference in factory price of cassava from farmers, although the starch content indicated different levels (B =18%, C=14% or D =10%). The Malang-4 could be introduced to the local goverment for being grown in a larger areas in the North Sumatera province.
- cassava growers
- introduced varieties
- root yield
How to Cite
National Development Planning Agency. Indonesian economy outlook 2017 global risk challenge. ministry of national development planning agency (Bappenas); 2017.
BPS. Statistics Indonesia. Indonesian statistics. Statistical Year Book of Indonesia 1981 to 2014. Central Bureau of Statistics Jakarta Indonesia; 2015.
Flach M, Rumawas F. (Eds.). Plant resources of South-East Asia No 9. Plants yielding non-seed carbohydrates. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. 1996; 237.
de Oliveira EJ, Fukuda WMG, de Oliveira1 SAS, Ringenberg R, Silva MR, Souza AS, Silva ALL, Filho MSO, Faria ML, Silva RJS. BRS Novo Horizonte – a new cassava variety for industrial use. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology. 2020;20(2):e28882028.
Howeler RH. The cassava handbook. Centro International de Agricultural Tropical (CIAT) office for Asia. Chatuchak, Bangkok Thailand. 2012;810.
Ispandi A, Santoso LJ, Mayar. Fertilization and dynamics of potassium in soil and cassava in dry land Alfisol, In Koes Hartojo el al.(ed). Empowerment of cassava supports national food security and community agribusiness development. Balitkabi. 2003;190-201.
Utomo WH, Marjuki, Wargiono, Hartoyo K, Suharjo Retnaningtyas E, Santoso D, Wijaya A, Howeler R. Enhancing the adoption of improved cassava production and utilization systems in Indonesia (The ACIAR Cassava Project in Indonesia). Conference: A New Future for Cassava in Asia: Its Use as Food, Feed and Fuel to Benefit the Poor. Proc. 8th Regional Workshop held in Vientiane, Lao PDR. Oct 20-24, 2008. Vientiane, Lao PDR. 2008;490-506.
Radjit BS, Nila P, Munip A, Nasir S. Efficient production technology of early maturing cassava in dry land and tidal land with a potential yield of 40-60 t/ha. Balitkabi Technical Report; 2010.
Radjit BS, Widodo Y, Saleh N, Prasetiaswati N. Technology to increase productivity and profitability of cassava farming in Ultisol dry land. Food crop science and technology. 2014;9(1):51–62.
Yatno E. The role of organic matter in improving soil physical quality and crop production. Journal of Land Resources. Journal of Land Resources. 2011;5(1):11-23.
Misganaw CD, Bayou WD. Tuber yield and yield component performance of cassava (Manihot esculenta) varieties in Fafen District, Ethiopia. International Journal of Agronomy, 2020;1-6. Article ID 5836452.
Parkes EY, Allotey DF, Lotsu E, Akuffo EA. Yield performance of five cassava varieties under different fertilizer rate. International J. Of Agricultural Sci. 2012;2(5):173-177.
Ojeniyi SO, Adejoro SA, Ikotun O, Amusan O. Soil and plant nutrient composition, growth and yield of cassava as influenced by integrated application of NPK fertilizer and poultry manure.2012. New York Sci.J. 2012;5(9):62–68.
Odunaya AA. Contribution of the “Cassava: Adding Value for Africa” (C:AVA) project to income generation in Nigeria: The case cassava farmers and processors in Ewekoro Area of Ogun State. A research project submitted to Larenstein University of Applied Sciences In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Development, with Specialization in; Rural Development and Food Security. Wageningen. 2012; 49.
Biscaye P, Clark C, Javaid K, Lawrence A, Neidhart M, Harris KP, Rudder J, Anderson CL, Reynolds T. Agribusiness development clusters, SEZs and incubators: Lessons learned for smallholder-focused agricultural development. EPAR Brief No. 302 Prepared for the Agricultural Development Team of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. University of Washington. 2015;82.
Abula M, Mohammed M. The impact of fertilizers subsidy on cassava production in Nigeria (1986-2010). International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences; 2013.
Available:www.ijfas.com ©2013 IJFAS Journal-2013-2-11/272-276 ISSN 2322-4134 ©2013 IJFAS.
Patino MTO, Okechukwu RU, Iyangbe C, Osun T. Growth of agro-enterprises in developing countries: The case of cassava processing enterprise in Nigeria. A Research Article in African Journal of Root and Tuber Crops AJRTC. 2013;10(1):61-66.
Soukkhamthat T, Wong GY. Technical efficiency analysis of small-scale cassava farming in Lao PDR. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development. 2016;13(1):21-39.
Ayetigbo O, Latif S, Abass A, Müller J. Comparing characteristics of root, flour and starch of biofortified yellow-flesh and white-flesh cassava variants, and sustainability considerations: A review. Sustainability. 2018;10:3089.
Abstract View: 111 times
PDF Download: 39 times