• Submission

Annual Research & Review in Biology

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions & Author Guideline
    • Accepted Papers
    • Editorial Policy
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewers
    • Propose a Special Issue
    • Reprints
    • Subscription
    • Membership
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Digital Archiving Policy
    • Contact
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Publication Charge
  • Submission
  • Testimonials
  • Announcements
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2021 - Volume 36 [Issue 12]
  4. Original Research Article

Submit Manuscript


Subscription



  • Home Page
  • Author Guidelines
  • Editorial Board Member
  • Editorial Policy
  • Propose a Special Issue
  • Membership

Occupational and Environmental Health Concerns on Unsafe Acts and Conditions in Poultry Production Sites in Ido-Osi, Ekiti State, Nigeria

  • A. O. Oluyege
  • K. O. Ojo

Annual Research & Review in Biology, Page 111-119
DOI: 10.9734/arrb/2021/v36i1230468
Published: 20 December 2021

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract


Aim: Many food animal production facilities are sited close to human residence. This research work seeks to establish the occupational and environmental burdens of unsafe acts and conditions in backyard poultry production sites in the area of study in order to validate the compliance level of poultry farmers to common safety regulations.


Place and Duration of Study: Microbiology Department, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, from February 2017 to December 2019.


Methodology: A well-structured questionnaire was administered to farm managers and residents within the area of study. Data on poultry management attitudes and history of water use were collected. The coordinates of the poultry sites, natural water bodies, source area and their relative distances were determined using the Geographical System Information Software, Mapit GIS. Fecal droppings from poultry birds were randomly sampled with a sterile swab stick and transferred into a factory-packed polythene bag. The suspension of the fecal droppings was streaked on Eosin Methylene Blue agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hours. Waste-water, soil from disposal sites, and poultry feed samples were also collected in sterile universal bottles, serially diluted and cultured. E. coli isolates were characterized using relevant biochemical tests. The modified paper disc-diffusion method was used to determine the isolates’ sensitivity to nine tested antibiotics. The results were interpreted based on the procedures of the clinical and laboratory standard institutes.


Results: Majority of the poultry farms under survey, 83% adopted the intensive ranging system of farming while few adopted the free range system. Layers were the most reared, 50%. There was no documented health, safety and regulatory protocols used on all the farms leading to variations in poultry management practices. Accumulated poultry droppings were periodically disposed between 3-4 days into open fields, flowing water bodies and pits. Among the three adopted waste disposal options, disposal into open field was rampant, 67%. Also, some of the poultry farmers, 42% applied the collected poultry droppings as farm yard manure. Family members constitute the major labor force, 92% on the farm. There were contacts between few of the farmers and their clients during routine farm activities. Majority of the farmers, 83.3% were not kitted with commonly-used personal protective equipment while coverall was only used by few. The five natural water bodies found within the area of study were majorly used for agricultural, domestic, and, recreational purposes. There was history of diarrhea in respondents, 12% with exposure to the water bodies. Socio-demographic data show that young, married-males with tertiary education comprise the major farming population. The relative distance of poultry farms to residential site is ≤ 6 meters while the proximity of poultry farms to natural water sources is between 160 meters to 4,596 meters. Antibiotic sensitivity test shows that multiple antibiotic-resistant bacteria were present in poultry droppings, waste water and soil from poultry waste disposal sites. Bacterial resistance to the fluoroquinolones, sulphonamide, tetracycline, aminoglycoside and penicillin was high.


Conclusion: The findings on unsafe act audit of the poultry production sites assert that safety of public health is dependent on the quality of water and soil found in human environment. Unsafe acts and conditions with the inherent occupational hazards in poultry production sites are attributed to non-functional health, safety and environment management system. Antibiotic resistant bacteria in poultry droppings constitute biological hazard to humans. Exposure to these biological hazards predisposes the public to infections. Human and environmental health can be improved by reviewing the national guidelines and standards for environmental pollution control.


Keywords:
  • Poultry
  • safety
  • unsafe acts and conditions
  • waste.
  • Full Article – PDF
  • Review History

How to Cite

Oluyege, A. O., & Ojo, K. O. (2021). Occupational and Environmental Health Concerns on Unsafe Acts and Conditions in Poultry Production Sites in Ido-Osi, Ekiti State, Nigeria. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 36(12), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2021/v36i1230468
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

References

Adelowo OO, Fagade OE, Agerso Y. Antibiotic resistance and resistance genes in Escherichia coli from poultry farms, southwest Nigeria. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2014;8(9):1103-1112.

Roy K, Lebens M, Svennerholm A, Teneberg S. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Etpa mediates adhesion between flagella and host cells. Nature. 2009; 457:594–598.

Nhung TN, Niwat CN, Carrique-Mas JJ. Antimicrobial resistance in bacterial poultry pathogens: A review. Front Veterinary Science. 2017;4:126.

Yassin AK, Gong J, Kelly P, Lu G, Guardabassi L, Wei L. Antimicrobial resistance in clinical Escherichia coli isolates from poultry and livestock, China. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9):0185326.

Martinez JL. Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants. Environmental Pollution. 2009;157:2893–2902.

Marathe NP, Regina VR, Walujkar SA, Charan SS, Moore ERB, Larsson DGJ. A treatment plant receiving waste water from multiple bulk drug manufacturers is a reservoir for highly multi-drug resistant integron-bearing bacteria. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77310.

Graham DW, Collignon P, Davies J, Larsson DGJ, Snape J. Underappreciated role of regionally poor water quality on globally increasing antibiotic resistance. Environmental Science and Technology. 2014;48(20): 11746–11747.

Chang Q, Wang W, Regev-Yochay G, Lipsitch M, Hanage WP. Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: How worried should we be?. Evolutionary Application. 2015;8:240–245.

Davis GS, Waits K, Nordstrom L, Weaver B, Aziz M, Gauld L, et al. Intermingled Klebsiella pneumoniae populations between retail meats and human urinary tract infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015;61(6):892–899.

Börjesson S, Ny S, Egervärn M, Bergström J, Rosengren Å, Englund S, et al. Limited dissemination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase and plasmid encoded AmpC–producing Escherichia coli from food and farm animals, Sweden. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2016;22(4):15.

Garcia-Graells C, Antoine JL, Catry B, Skov R, Dennis O. Livestock veterinarians at risk of acquiring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST39. Epidemiology and Infection. 2012;140(3): 383-389.

Köck R, Loth B, Köksal M, Schulte-Wülwer J, Harlizius J, Friedrich AW. Persistence of nasal colonization with livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farmers after holidays from pig exposure. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 2012;78(11): 4046–4047.

Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, Andersen PS, et al. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: Host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. MBio. 2012;3(1): 305-311.

Wampler PJ, Rediske RR, Molla AR. Using arc map, google earth, and global positioning systems to select and locate random households in rural Haiti. International Journal of Health Geographics. 2013;12(3):12-13.

Ieven ME, Vercauteren P, Descheemaeker F, Van Laer F, Goossens H. Comparison of direct plating and broth enrichment culture for the detection of intestinal colonization by glycopeptide-resistant Enterococci among hospitalized patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1999;37 (5):1436–1440.

Muhammad AA, Hassan SMR, Saidul A, Momena, S. Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from poultry and poultry environment of Bangladesh. American Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2009;5(1):47-52.

CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard—eleventh edn. CLSI document M02-A11. Wayne, PA, USA; 2013.

Adebowale OO, Adeyemo OK, Awoyomi O, Dada R. Antibiotic use and practices in commercial poultry laying hens in Ogun State Nigeria. Revue d. Elevage et de. Medecine Veterinaire des Pays Tropicaux. 2016;67(1):41-45.

Marshall, BM, Levy SB. Food animals and antimicrobials: Impacts on human health. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2011;24: 718–733.
  • Abstract View: 278 times
    PDF Download: 109 times

Download Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Telegram
Make a Submission / Login
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo


© Copyright 2010-Till Date, Annual Research & Review in Biology. All rights reserved.