Improve Hygienic Quality of Egyptian Karish Cheese Employing Isolated Antagonistic Lactobacilli Strains

Marwa G. Allam

Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Amira M. G. Darwish *

Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Egypt and Department of Food Technology, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute (ALCRI), City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City), Alexandria, Egypt.

Eman H. E. Ayad

Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Egypt.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Good health is one of the sustainable development goals. This study aims to improve hygienic quality of Karish Egyptian traditional cheese, using two wild antagonistic Lactobacilli isolates used as individual starter cultures; KP623 (Lb. plantarum) and KP654 (Lb. delbrueckii subsp. lactis) isolated from Karish cheese to keep autochthonous properties and function as bio-preservatives to extend shelf life. Collected Karish cheese samples were micro-biologically analyzed. Two isolates; KP623 and KP654 were selected for application out of thirty-seven Lactobacilli lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated strains and identified via 16S rRNA approach. Collected Karish samples reflected their inferior quality containing high counts of coliform, Staphylococcus spp., yeasts and molds (5.18, 2.51 and 4.95 Log10 CFU g-1 respectively). Employing the two antagonistic isolates enhanced both microbial quality and organoleptic properties. Results encourage recommending the two Lactobacilli strains as starter cultures for safe products avoiding human illness and economic losses.

Keywords: Lactobacillus spp., wild strains, hygienic quality, Karish cheese, 16S rRnA.


How to Cite

G. Allam, Marwa, Amira M. G. Darwish, and Eman H. E. Ayad. 2017. “Improve Hygienic Quality of Egyptian Karish Cheese Employing Isolated Antagonistic Lactobacilli Strains”. Annual Research & Review in Biology 19 (2):1-13. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2017/37116.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.